A Fever is actually good for you! Who would’ve thought?

Dr. Levi

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/4341061/That-dreadful-fever-may-be-good-for-you

We did!

Abstaining from fever reducers such as the popular tylenol can turn out to be good for your health and a lifesaver.

A study that has been published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine said that the  results were striking, and showed that animals given drugs to fight a fever were more likely to die from flu. “The ones treated with anti-fever agents died at about a 30 per cent higher rate. It was as simple as that.”

The results led the team to believe fevers could be a natural protective mechanism which kicked in when animals had flu, to improve their chances of survival.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951171/pdf/403.pdf

The study also points out what was just recently discovered about fever reducers and reduced vaccine efficacy.

“It is also possible that the increased mortality
risk with NSAID and paracetamol treatments may
have been partially due to their immunological or
anti-inflammatory effects, unrelated to antipyretic
activity.This is suggested by the recent study
which showed that the reduction in antibody response
to vaccination with paracetamol treatment
occurred in children with or without febrile responses.
44”

In plain words, the fever reducer blunted the immune system. If you reduce a fever you reduce the immune response and the ability to fight infections. Even attempting to do so with out a fever can cause immune system dysfunction.

I’ve known about this before because I know the principle law that governs the health of our bodies. But the timing of this article is relevant to me because my daughter’s daycare called me last week with permission to treat a fever that she began to express. They also suggested that I get her to the doctor right away so that she could be treated with tamiflu or another antiviral medication(which I would NEVER EVER do! EVER!).

Who taught us to be afraid of fevers? Our mothers? Grandmothers? Who taught them? Doctors! Who taught them?

The main thing that people are afraid of with fevers is a febrile seizure which can be scary. But what is not discussed is that febrile seizures can come on without warning and can even come on at low fever temperatures (101 degrees). It’s not how high the temperature gets. It’s how fast. And that cannot be predicted or prevented without recommending to everyone to “reduce the fever”.  But it turns out that this one size fits all medical advice is not wise because these medications have not been shown to prevent febrile seizures.

But back to the “who taught us that we need to reduce fevers and be afraid of high fevers? ”

In a recent journal article it was found that the combination of the measles,mumps,rubella, varicella(chickenpox) vaccine(MMRV)  doubled the already increased risk of seizure with measles vaccine.

But since a medical procedure actually caused the seizure instead of infection then the role of seizure was downplayed.

Dr. Klein pointed out that febrile seizures are common but usually harmless in children. “Up to 5% of children 6 months to 5 years of age can have a febrile seizure, and they are almost always due to colds or other infections. These seizures are a benign condition and they self-resolve. They don’t have any long-term side effects; they don’t, for example, lead to seizures and they don’t lead to epilepsy.”

However, they can be alarming. “The seizures can be very frightening for parents,” said Dr. Klein. “Typically, it’s a full-body convulsion and so parents do bring [the] child to the emergency department.”

So the message is if a fever comes on from viral or bacterial origin then it should be medically monitored and possibly controlled.

If the fever is from a medical origin and results in “full body convulsions” then it’s not a big deal. It will “self-resolve”.

No wonder people are so confused about medication and the role it plays in their family’s health.

So the next time you or your child gets a fever, what do you do? What types of questions will you ask?

Be hated by the world!

Well, as you might guess, I think there is value in being hated by the world.  Now what does that mean?  I really don’t hope that you guys hate me, I kind of like you, and hope for the same in return.  But I don’t consider you guys to be of the world so much.

I recently had a guy who came to my doctor’s report, he made a decision right afterwards that he was going to pay in full for the year, and that he was going to have his wife checked out.  This guy, interestingly enough, had addressed with Loree that he wasn’t so fond of the Christian characteristics that my office carries.  So anyways, he went home, and called back a few hours later asking for a refund.

We weren’t too shocked; upset because we always want an opportunity to share our beliefs as they relate to health and other areas.  But he was really “of the world”, so when he went back home, he got into the culture, and he didn’t like the anti-medicine stance, so he contacted some friends in the medical community, and of course we stand out as being abrasive and someone to be violently opposed by anyone who puts their faith in the medical community.

So what I am asking of you, is to stand up in a way that makes you painful to others.  You know what I mean.  You know.  Like, when you have that friend who is always trying to make the right choice, but you just want to eat more donuts, and so when you are around them it makes your decisions painful.  You feel guilty, so you just choose to not be around that person anymore.  We have all been there at some point in our life, as it relates to something… now it is your turn.

The key however, is to NOT alienate people, it is simply to stand in the way of progress of evil.  SO you need to LOVE the people, but HATE the choice.  It is because I love you that I am willing to stand here and beg you to never eat at McDonald’s again.  And if you would let me bend your ear on the subject, I could communicate to you why it is necessary to never eat there again.  You might be saying, “not so hard, I could do that”… so how about Chick-fil-A?  They are just as bad.  But the issue is with those who really, really, really like McDonalds, or Chick-fil-A.  They really don’t want to spend anytime letting me talk about those, because it hurts a little. 

In order to take that step that lets the world hate me just a little, it takes caring for the person MORE than the amount I care for the way they think about me. 

I don’t want you to simply be hated, but I want everyone who is tied to culture, intimately tied to culture, to be a little disgusted with you over something.  There are too many areas of culture that are destructive.  They are destructive to your physical health, they are destructive to your mental health.  The constant bombardment of our psyche with medication solutions, with poor diet choices, and with so many potential wastes of time.  If you take the stand that you will be above and beyond many of these, because of your pursuit of health, then the world will not appreciate your choices, but you will be WAY better off for it!

So don’t go do anything to get yourself hated by someone, but the world as a whole, well… you’ll be better off if it hates you!  God Bless!

TSA Scanners = BAD!

Check out the lates Daily Sprout, there has been media coverage today specifically focusing on the dangers of the TSA scanners.  I would recommend you read the sprout, and avoid the scanners!

Dr. Eric

TSA Body Scanners = RADIATION

This first excerpt is from Mike Adams, The Health Ranger from 10/19/10

(NaturalNews) I encountered my first airport naked body scanner while flying out of California today, and of course I decided to “opt out” of the scan. You do this by telling the blue-shirted TSA agents that you simply wish to opt out of the body scanner. Here’s what happened after that:

A TSA agent told me to step to the side and stay put. He then proceeded to shout out loudly enough for all the other travelers and TSA agents to hear, “OPT OUT! OPT OUT!” This is no doubt designed to attract attention (or perhaps humiliation) to those who choose to opt out of the naked body scanner. I saw no purpose for this verbal alert because the same TSA agent who was yelling this ultimately was the one who patted me down anyway.

For the pat down, first I was required to walk through the regular metal detector. From there, I was asked if I wanted to be patted down in a private room, or if I didn’t mind just being patted down in full view of everyone else. Not being a shy person in the first place, I told the agent I didn’t need a private room.

He then explained to me that he was going to pat down my entire body, including my crotch and my buttocks, but that he would use the back of his hands to pat down the crotch and buttocks areas. This is probably designed to make the pat-down seem less “personal” and more detached. That way, air passengers can’t complain of being felt up by TSA agents who might get carried away with the pat-down procedure. He asked if it hurt for me to be touched anywhere, and I told him no, at which point he proceeded with the pat down.

It was a well-scripted pat-down, covering all the areas of my body, including a mild crotch sweep (it wasn’t especially invasive or anything, as doctors will do far worse during a physical exam). He swept my arms, legs, hips, back of the neck, ankles and everywhere else. To the TSA’s credit, this guy was fast, efficient and only used a light touch that was in no way disturbing. But it did take an extra five minutes or so compared to walking through the naked body scanner.

Speaking of the naked body scanners, as I was having my crotch swept by the back of the hand of this TSA agent, I was observing other air travelers subjecting themselves to the naked body scanners. They were told to walk into the body scanner staging area and then hold their arms in the air in a pose as if they were under arrest. They were told to freeze in this position for several seconds (perhaps 10 seconds) during which they were being blasted with ionizing radiation that we all know contributes to cancer.

The TSA, of course, will tell you that these machines can’t possibly contribute to cancer. But they said the same thing about mammograms, and we now know that mammograms are so harmful to women’s health that they actually harm ten women for everyone one woman they help (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html). So I’m not exactly taking the U.S. government at its word that naked body scanner radiation is “harmless.”

As these air travelers were being scanned, their naked body images were appearing on a screen somewhere, of course. Some TSA agent was examining the naked body shape and contours of all these people, and even though we were told by the TSA that the image viewing machines cannot store images, we have since learned that the machines actually do have the capability to store those images (http://www.naturalnews.com/029378_f…). In addition, rogue TSA employees could simply use their cell phones to take snapshots of what they see on the screen. There are no doubt rules against such behavior, but it’s bound to happen sooner or later.

Meanwhile, my own security screening was proceeding fully clothed. I don’t want to broadcast my naked butt cheeks on the TSA’s graphic monitors, thank you very much!

Very few people opt out of the naked body scanners

The most fascinating part about this entire process was not the verbal broadcast of my opt out status, nor having my crotch swept by the latex-covered back hand of some anonymous TSA agent, but rather the curious fact that I was the only one opting out. Although I must have watched at least a hundred people go through this particular security checkpoint, there wasn’t a single other person who opted out of the naked body scan.

They all just lined up like cattle to have their bodies scanned with ionizing radiation.

Dr. Eric:

And so I wonder too, why we don’t opt out?  Not wanting to seem suspicious, or perhaps because we are too hurried to care if we are killing ourselves.  Most commonly however, I believe we tend to think if everyone it is doing it, then it is safe.  But my readers know that cannot be true; such is the case with McDonald’s.  We recently reviewed that 50% of a chicken McNugget is filler and toxic garbage… but a lot of people are eating there!

Take a look at this more recent article excerpt from Mike Adams:

…I’ve received a steady stream of reports from people who are traveling, all of whom are now choosing to opt out of the scanners. The reports coming in demonstrate an amazing ignorance among TSA security screeners about how the naked body scanners actually work.

One report from a very credible source (a famous health author whom I know quite well) reveals that TSA officers told her the naked body scanners don’t even emit X-rays. “It’s a myth,” the officer said. “There are no X-rays from those machines.”

Really? Then how do they work? Are they MAGIC? Do TSA officers cast a magic Spell of X-Ray Vision on the air travel passengers like some sort of Dungeons & Dragons adventure?

(Or maybe the TSA officers simply buy those X-Ray vision glasses advertised in the back of comic books and use those to gawk at passengers.)

That the TSA’s own employees don’t even know these machines emit radiation is a real whopper. But of course it only makes sense: They’ve probably been told this by the TSA because no person in their right mind would actually work 8 hours a day standing next to a machine that emits radiation every few seconds (no matter how seemingly small the dosage).

Dr. Eric:  WOW!!  This is really sad, but guess what, the ignorance doesn’t stop there!  I had a patient tell me last Monday that she rushed to the ER because of pain in her lower abdomen.  The doc wanted to look at the ureter in order to determine if there was a kidney stone.  They needed to take a CAT scan (CT Scan = somputerized tomography) to see the ureter.  My patient wisely asked for an MRI instead, and the NURSE told her that there was more radiation from an MRI!!!   AARGGHHH!!

There is NO radiation from an MRI, where a CAT scan is listed as having moderate to high radiation esposure!  I could not believe it, that a practicing nurse would believe that an MRI has more radiation, when there is actually NO radiation whatsoever.

Listen to this very important piece of information, YOU NEED TO BE EDUCATED.  Avoid the body scanners, take the pat down.

Lawsuits pile up against Merck

Merck, commonly referred to as the worst offender by our office, is at it again.  Once more we see a drug that has been brought to the market by Merck, that is causing serious side effects.  Fosamax.

As reported by the New York Times, individuals taking Fosamax, are at greater risk of jawbone death, a condition where the jawbone actually dies (along with fracture), and deteriorates from that site.  This side effect has been found to be occurring more and more often, to the extent that there are no 1400 lawsuits filed against Merck for this reason.

Fosamax, as many of you are surely aware, is a drug in a class known as bisphosphonates, which are designed to improve bone density, or fight osteoporosis.  This is why the news of bone death was a particularly startling conclusion for this class of drugs. 

The FDA recently approved a new notice on these drugs, that simply states that the time for treatment with these drugs is unknown.  This is their warning that is basically saying, “we have no idea if this drug is dangerous or not, but we think there might be some risk to taking it over longer periods of time”.  Warnings like this are designed to appease two groups of people, the consumers who feel concerned about these new cases coming out; and the drug company who wants to deflect any blame, and play it down.  This is why the FDA is really quite useless to us.

The sad thing is that there have been many research papers that have shown that the best way to reduce osteoporosis is indeed NOT to take a medication, but rather to engage in appropriate exercise designed to stress the bones and joints in an appropriate manner.

A simple Google Search returns many RESULTS on this topic. 

So beware of the drugs, keep it clean, and keep it healthy!  God bless your weekend!!

How Toxic is too Toxic?

Toxicity is a tough thing to put your finger on.  It is very difficult to know how toxic you are, whether that is a problem or not, or if there is a long term consequence.  Which is why I am writing this for one reason.  CANCER is at the end of a toxic life.  PERIOD.  There is no other option, if you are too toxic, you will get cancer.  We can deny, or argue, but with the increasing rates of cancer that we see every year in this country, it is obvious that we are RUNNING towards cancer.

Dr. Mercola’s recent article on Chicken McNuggetswas a shock to many who read it, but it was simple truth to myself and those who have been reading my Sprout’s for the last several years.  The article tells that 50% of a chicken McNugget is chicken, the rest is primarily chemical and filler.  The problem is that it is loaded with serious toxins, and rich with GMO ingredients.  The whole thing is a toxic mess.

Let me reiterate, CANCER is the by-product of a toxic lifestyle.  I know you do not want cancer, but I also know you don’t realize how close or far away from it you are.  When we performed our Toxic Body testing for the very first time, I found patients with toxins in their bodies that were coming from eating habits, cooking habits, personal care products, batteries that they were using, equipment that they were operating, lawncare products they were using and the water that they were drinking.

Have you double checked all of these products?  Do you have just one that you are using?  Perhaps you are using many of these products that are distributing toxins to your body, and you are competing for detoxifying enzymes in your liver.  Making it that much harder for your body to stay ahead.  When I present our detoxification workshop on November 29th, I will be hitting some extremely powerful information.  There will be  a lot that is highly technical, but it will all make sense.  Over the years I have done four entirely different detox workshops, and this is the one that really hits everything in the easiest way.

So what is detox?  Well, really it is a lifestyle, but it starts with a hard charge towards that lifestyle.  Pushing to make a huge initial change, then settling in after that.  It is reducing toxins, while supporting detoxifying processes in the body.  The thing is, you have MANY detoxifying processes in your body, and the key to knowing what to do, is knowing which ones are at greatest need.  How do you know?

Toxin testing.  If you want to know what you need to do, if you want it to be impressed upon you so that you really take a stand, then you need to part with $85 this week and have your hair assessed.  It is an absolute deal, and I can’t think of one person over the age of 8 who shouldn’t be tested in my practice (except for those who have been recently tested).  Seriously, this is a MUST DO kind of thing.  Then the workshop is MUST ATTEND kind of workshop.  I don’t want to keep you up at night with this information, but I REALLY want to be sure you are a little nervous about the decisions you are making with regards to food, and personal care products.

Sign up today, get your Bio Impredance Analysis  (BIA) scheduled (included) and set the workshop in your schedule for the 29th.  You know, one of the coolest things about the BIA, is that it tests your phase angle. Phase Angle is a great way to measure the health of your cells, and particularly helps identify cellular wasting disorders and disease progression (cancer, AIDS, diabetes, etc).  This is a great way to know how healthy your cells are… actually, it is the only way!

So for those of you who are reading this online, and you don’t have a chiropractor who does this kind of thing, send us your zip code and we’ll try to find you one… or perhaps you can test through us, and I will post a video of my workshop for you!  For those of you sitting in my office reading this, don’t squander how fortunate you are to be able to get this done.

Mitch is WELL again!

I love telling chiropractic stories, so this one is still in development really, but why not give you an early snapshot?  I have been taking care of members of the Fossier family for over 7 years now.  Rick (dad) played hockey with me back when I was still playing.  His sons, Mitch and Zach were little kids back then (teenagers now).

Recently Rick moved himself and Mitch up to Detroit for the winter hockey season.  Yeah, I know, sounds kind of weird, but with dad being an ex Yale University and Michigan State hockey player, the sport is deep in this family’s blood; and Mitch is more than a talented hockey player, he has great potential.   Anyways, they found a condo outside of Detroit, and Mitch is playing for a high level hockey team.

Now one thing about Mitch, is that he is good in a sport that requires a lot of strength and power… and grit.  He is good, and he is very small for his age.  Strong, but small.  So it wasn’t but five or so weeks ago that he broke his collarbone, for the second time in as many years.  Not a great situation.  He came back home, I X-Rayed him, looked at the break, looked at his spine, and gave my opinion.

“He needs to strengthen his shoulders, his spine is curved right at the level of the collarbone causing nerve pressure.  It might be curved right now because of the injury, and the antalgic (pain produced) position that he is in.  Or it might be more chronic of a position… he needs a chiropractor up there regardless.”

Well, it was just about ten days ago that Rick contacts me about Mitch, and lets me know that he has had no energy, can’t hardly climb the stairs without breathing really hard, and his heart rate is just shooting through the roof.  He is concerned that there is something wrong with his heart.  I remember the x-rays, and immediately re-explain the nervous system.

DrE – “Everything is controlled through the nervous system, and the heart is maintained by the two nerves at the top of the thoracic spine, which are right where the curvature is that we found.  He needs to get those nerves working!”

RF – “We have an appointment with a cardiologist to check his heart out, what do you think?”

DrE – “Sure check it out, but it is probably fine.  And even if there is something wrong with his heart, the thing that heals his heart, that organizes that tissue into normal functioning heart tissue, the thing that arranges cells in the exact pattern to insure a functioning heart and heart valves, are those nerves.  So IF something is wrong, he needs to get that part of his spine straightened.”

So he flew home, and stayed an extra day so I could adjust him.  They got checked out by the cardiologist and the diagnosis was clear.  The heart looks great, nothing is wrong with the heart!  Whew (I could practically hear that in the text message).  But honestly, I would not have thought there would be anything wrong with his heart.  It came on suddenly, immediately following trauma… the chiropractic model was too obvious of a fit here.

So Mitch has found a chiropractor in Michigan, he has been getting adjusted a lot, and he is doing great.  Feeling better, much more controlled heart rate and rhythm… performing much better on the ice.  On his way to 100% healing, or he might already be there.

This isn’t the first time we saw something like this in our office in a teenager.  Lauren was 17 years old, she had a sudden onset of tachycardia (rapid heart rate), to the extent where she had hit 200 beats per minute while sitting at her desk in school.  Complete fear had engulfed this girl, and her parents.  Doctors at Emory tested her and could find no reason for her rapid heart rate.

The problem continued, and frequency continued.  Now, let me give you some background on Lauren.  She was getting adjusted in our office about twice a month for the prior year.  So it might be easy for someone to think that chiropractic had failed her, wasn’t working, etc.  The reality is that Lauren had not been committed to care, there were bigger problems in her spine, and we had never even given those a shot.  Once the problem with the heart got bad, her parents still weren’t ready to commit to more care (I am sure they thought there was nothing more to be done by us).  It wasn’t until the docs finally said “The nerves to her heart are giving the wrong signal, so we are going to burn those nerves off, and install a pacemaker, which will maintain her heart rate.”

They wanted to give this girl a pacemaker at 17 years of age!!  So she got full re-examined, showed serious irritation to the nerves going to the heart, and started getting adjusted three to four times a week.  It was about four weeks later that she was completely done with that symptom.  No surgery, no more docs.

Interesting thing is that you may have heard me tell the story of Lauren’s son before.  Dillon was her baby who had seizures in his first hours of life, until getting an adjustment at the hospital.  Safe to say that she has had her full measure of chiropractic stories!

Be well, stay adjusted, and keep the faith!

Gluten Free Bad?

I was just watching ABC Nightline, and I am dismayed.

I have nothing against gluten, other than it happens to be one of the most inflammatory proteins in existence.  Especially for people who have ANY kind of leaky gut syndrome, and has been shown to be one of the most important proteins removed from the diets of MANY autistic individuals around the country.  I still eat gluten, not much, but I do.

So where this moment of rage is coming from, is the “Expert” that they chose to speak about the dangers of a gluten free diet, was clearly an idiot.  I am sorry, I believe he is a child of God, loved to no end.  However, he knows nothing of the nutritional world.  OK, rambling, and it is doing all of you no good, because you didn’t watch the show anyways.

But I want to clear the air.  You will NOT be deficient of anything if you go gluten free, and know how to eat.  Knowing how to eat allows and affords you the ability to go gluten free with NO problems at all.  B vitamin deficiency was a stated concern by this expert.  Though gluten foods tend to be one of the moderate solutions for B Vitamins, where poultry tends to be the best source.  So if you are a vegetarian, now what?  Beans.  If you are on the healing diet?  Well you can’t be a very good vegetarian on the healing diet, so back to poultry!

In addition, there was no supportive information for any other negative effect of the gluten free diet, just bad.

So what I really wanted to touch on here, is BLINDNESS.  Not blindness as you are thinking, not the blindness that I have in my left eye.  But the kind of blindness that happens when you are so caught up in the way things have been done, and the comforts of your current life, that all you think about is the interference that is coming from a new idea.  We all know this very well, because as a part of our healthcare family, you have been ridiculed by someone, at some point, for your actions or beliefs.

If you believe anything that I teach, and you have shared any of that with someone else… they have probably felt threatened by your rejection of culture, and they argued.  With no understanding of what they were arguing for, they argued because they want to feel comfortable in their decisions, and anything you do that opposes that makes them feel wrong.  And Heaven forbid anyone should feel wrong about their lifestyle decisions.  I mean come on, 66% dying from heart disease and cancer… why in the world should anyone deviate from the cultural way?

Thanks for reading my rant.  If anyone ever attacks your lifestyle decisions, trust me… first think about the “what if” scenario that happens if they are right.  Then make a statement.

A Medical Professor Reviews the System

This is an interview excerpt by Discover Magazine with Nortin Hadler M.D, a professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

The full interview can be found here:

http://discovermagazine.com/2005/jun/discover-dialogue

Bypass surgery belongs in the medical archives . . . No Western European nation has as high a rate of bypass surgery and angioplasty as we do—and they live longer

Under what circumstances do you think bypass surgery is appropriate?

H: None. I think bypass surgery belongs in the medical archives. There are only two reasons you’d ever want to do it: one, to save lives, the other to improve symptoms. But there’s only one subset of the population that’s been proved to derive a meaningful benefit from the surgery, and that’s people with a critical defect of the left main coronary artery who also have angina. If you take 100 60-year-old men with angina, only 3 of them will have that defect, and there’s no way to know without a coronary arteriogram. So you give that test to 100 people to find 3 solid candidates—but that procedure is not without complications. Chances are you’re going to do harm to at least one in that sample of 100. So you have to say, “I’m going to do this procedure with a 1 percent risk of catastrophe to find the 3 percent I know I can help a little.” That’s a very interesting trade-off.


So you believe the vast majority of those who have had this major surgery have suffered through it for no reason? That seems so counterintuitive. Everyone seems to know a father or uncle who’s been given a new lease on life after their bypass surgery, with more energy and less chest pain.

H: This analysis is upsetting for people to hear—feel free to yell at me if you need to. I’m really asking people to rethink common sense. But people don’t realize that angina is an intermittent illness. It comes and goes. You can have it for months and then months off. Classic cardiologists used to help people handle the symptoms by treating it like a chronic illness. Well into the 1960s and 1970s, they helped people cope with the anticipation of pain, prescribing drugs like nitroglycerine and helping patients learn to wait until things calmed down a little bit.

But for those people bypass surgery helps, it’s not intermittent—it makes the pain go away altogether. Isn’t that worth something?

H: You have to consider how much of that relief is a function of natural history and placebo effects. In one controlled trial of surgery for angina, half the people with the condition underwent an operation in which doctors merely made a skin incision and closed it up; in the other half, the patients had a particular kind of bypass. The numbers from each group whose symptoms were significantly alleviated were about the same. Angina is particularly susceptible to the placebo effect because the anticipation of pain adds to the intermittency of it. FDA-approved pharmaceuticals for alleviating angina have about a 55 percent effectiveness level in randomized controlled trials; the placebo runs about 45 percent. Even if surgery could be proved to alleviate the discomfort, you’d have to consider if that offsets the risks of bypass surgery—about half the patients suffer severe depression after the surgery, a third suffer measurable memory loss, and many never go back to work again. Then there are the added risks of any major surgery.

You analyze the definitive studies and find that the number of people whose lives are saved by bypass surgery, angiograms, and cholesterol-lowering drugs is statistically insignificant—and yet life expectancy has risen since the advent of all three of those treatments. If it isn’t better cardiac care that’s extending lives, what is?

H: The start of the rise in longevity kicked in long before cardiac intervention became popular. Looking at life-course epidemiological studies, the secret lies in two questions: Are you comfortable in your socioeconomic status, and do you like your job? With regard to socioeconomic status, the central question relates to relative wealth—in other words, the smaller the income gap in a given area, the better the longevity. Where the income gap is larger, the poor die sooner. These are powerful associations. The answer does not lie in modern medicine but in modern society.

Surgery is obviously invasive, but why do you object to the widespread prescription of statins, the cholesterol-lowering drugs?

H: In men with normal cholesterol levels, the risk of death for those between ages 45 and 65 over the course of the next five years is only a fraction of 1 percent lower than it is for men with high serum cholesterol in the same category. The most thorough study to date had some 3,000 men with “high” cholesterol levels take a statin every day for five years, while 3,000 similar men took a placebo. When all was said and done, there was no difference in cardiovascular deaths between the two groups. Statins do reduce the risk of heart attack in those who have a strong family history of people in their family having heart attacks very young—but that’s a small percentage of the population. You could argue, looking at the data, that they’re helpful for people who’ve already had one heart attack. But for everyone else, the possible advantage is marginally and clinically insignificant.

If the data are not prompting so much interventional cardiology, what is?

H: Money. Interventional cardiology is what supports almost every hospital in America—it’s an enormous part of our gross domestic product. Every year in this country we do about half a million bypass grafts and 650,000 coronary angioplasties, with the mean cost of the procedures ranging from $28,000 to $60,000. There are a lot of people involved in this transfer of wealth. But no Western European nation has such a high rate of those procedures—and their longevity is higher than ours.

Organic or Natural?

The dilemma should have part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc… but for now I will just focus on the poultry dilemma.  So first off, let’s consider chicken.  In our pursuit of the healthiest possible foods to eat, we should eat organic first whenever we can.  When it comes to produce, be sure to follow the dirty dozen guidelines as your first choice in organic.

 So why is organic different than “All Natural”?  Well, sadly all natural really means nothing according to this Doctor’s research on the USDA, and the USDA guidelines are what matter.  If the term all natural is used, it appears as though it means NOTHING!  Even use of chemicals that have been altered from their original state appears to be fine in the all natural world, because all natural means derived from nature.  And as far as I know, nobody is using moon rocks in your food yet!

 Organic however, is a much more strict term, and if a product is actually ORGANIC then the USDA label will be attached.

 
This little picture means everything!

 With this label, you know that the product has been certified organic by the USDA… so what does that mean?  Well this USDA-FDA article sums it up better than I will, but here are the important details:

  1.  The symbol above means 95% or more of the product is Organic.
  2. Organic means that there have been no chemicals used in improving growth rates (fertilizer for plants, or growth hormone for animals), reducing pesticide rates (arsenic is present in conventional chicken feed, or pesticides and herbicides are sprayed on conventional plants), or reducing disease rates (antibiotics are given constantly in most conventional meat farming).  Organic farms use non-chemical methods for all of these areas.
  3. A separate distinction “Made from organic ingredients” is allowed if 70% of the product is made from organic material. 
  4. Organic designation can apply to foods that have been grown in CLEAN soil, which requires that the soil has been free of the above chemicals for three years, before the organic designation can start.  As I dig deeper into this ruling, it appears as though this requirement falls under the jurisdiction of the state, thus will vary from state to state.  Reading through Washington’s guidelines helps to understand WHY it is more expensive for organic!

 Because there is no specific designation for all natural, does not mean that you can make label claims of any type without reprimand.  There are very spcific rules for what claims are placed on a label, and fines can be steep if a producer is found to be outside of those guidelines.  If a product says no antibiotics, then it had better be… or no growth hormones.  However, claims of no antibiotics, no growth hormone, which are common in chicken.  Does not do anything to insure that the chickens are not raised on chemically treated feed (arsenic has been used to insure lasting storage in grain silos as well as to promote growth – don’t trust me… how about the NYTIMES). 

 You can find good ORGANIC chicken at either of these sellers websites:

  1. Black Wing Farm
  2. Greensbury Market

Eggs are another example of slick marketing to help sales, and encourage belief that you are eating the healthiest option for eggs out there.  In reality, organic in this industry is a mis label according to organic standards.  Mercola recently reviewed an article from The Cornucopia Institute that showed that most hens producing organic eggs have no access to the outdoors, which is part of the definition of organic in egg industry.  They conclude that the majority of US organic egg product should carry a label “Given Organic Feed” vs actually baring the USDA Organic label.

 The most valuable piece that comes from their research can be found HERE which is the scorecard of different egg producing farms.  Organic Valley, which is a very popular brand that can be purchased here in GA, receives a 3 out of 5.  Horizon Organic and Eggland’s Best both receive a HORRIBLE 1 out of 5 for their extemely poor conditions.  I would recommend you do not waste your money on either of those brands.

 I currently do not know where Trader Joe’s get’s their privately branded eggs, so I am unsure if that is a good option.  I would keep an eye out for wherever you can find Organic Valley.  They have a great “pasture butter” as well, which is organic butter from grass fed (pasture grazing) cows!

 Read this and other great articles at

http://DrEricRichards.com